Notes about M.E.’s Mark 16 sermon (Easter Sunday, 4/4/2021 Anno Domini)

Which was a defamation of the traditional Protestant ending of Saint Mark’s Gospel

• The Epistle Dedicatory and the Translators to the Reader predicted the apostates’ attitude and behavior towards the AV.
• Only 2 Greek mss don’t have it (B and Aleph). Over 5,000 majority text mss do have it.
• B and Aleph disagree 3,000 times in the Gospels alone
• Aleph was found in a wastebasket and B was found in the pope’s library!
• B and Aleph are in good condition because nobody wanted to use them
• B and Aleph aren’t the best because they are old. Being old is the only qualification for a manuscript. It’s a stupid as saying “You’ll find the greatest truth being preached in the oldest and most beautiful cathedrals of the world.”
• Corruption has been around since the time of the apostles (2 Cor. 2:17). And before that in the Garden of Eden (Gen. 3:1).
• You act like Satan has no interest in corrupting the word of God (Gen. 3:1; 2 Cor. 11:3)
• You slander the AV for the ‘long ending’ in Mark (as if it were an error), but what about “prophets” being changed to “Isaiah” in Mark 1:2 in the RSV and NRSV!!!
• M.E. isn’t preaching ecumenicism: he is preaching hardcore and radical liberal Alexandrianism and the destruction of any and every thing Protestant
• M.E. said there was only 1 version that retained the long ending. Wrong: check the Bishops, Geneva, Tyndale and all the foreign language Textus Receptus Bibles (most of which are available from Trinitarian Bible Society). Most Spanish-speaking Bible-believers would consider the Reina-Valera 1960 to be a liberal translation—yet even in the RVR 1960 Mark 16:9-20 is retained without any doubt-raising footnotes. It should also be noted: the Reina-Valera 1960 is probably the most widespread Spanish Bible version.
• The reason why you have only 1 that retains it, and many that remove it; is because the Holy Spirit has only 1 true Bible (the AV): and you Alexandrian fools have revised your corrupted scriptures scores of times because you are inconsistent and love the wages of unrighteousness (2 Pet. 2:15).
• You promote scholarship not faith
• You talk like Satan (Gen. 3:1) a destructive critic. The Lord Jesus Christ never questioned the preservation and inspiration of Scripture, to the contrary, He enforced it (see Matt. 4:4, 5:18, 24:35).
• B and Aleph attach the apocrypha to the “inspired” canon. Aleph has NT apocrypha.
• B omits scores of verses in the OT & NT. It completely omits the Book of Revelation (which identifies Rome as the great harlot) and everything in Hebrews after Heb. 9:14 (which expose the errors of the Roman catholic priesthood and mass ceremony.)
• What’s more likely? The father of lies (John 8:44) removed Christological and doctrinal words? Or added them to help believers? My answer: Mark 4:15.
• The KJV has been printed one billion times and there is no copyright on it (2 Tim. 2:9; 2 Thess. 3:1).
• The modern Alexandrian versions are simply a restoration of the Jesuit 1582 bible. The KJV translators had access to the 1582 translation but chose to ignore its erroneous popish readings; in favor of the Biblical texts of the Bible-believing churches. The Holy Ghost chose the AV over the Rheims to evangelize the world in the great missionary movements.
• Who taught you the AV had errors in it? The Holy Spirit didn’t teach you that. The Holy Spirit has never taught any Christian the AV has errors in it because He is “the Spirit of truth” (John 14:17, 15:26, 16:13) and the AV contains “the words of truth” (Prov. 22:21). Proud apostates (seminary ‘professors’ [Rom. 1:22]) who think they are smarter than the Holy Spirit taught you that.
• I trust a man like Erasmus with my Greek Text much more than somebody like Westcott or Hort.
• I’d rather have a copy of Mark’s Gospel which includes the Great Commission (Mark 16:15) than excludes it. Because that is also the same and last thing the Lord said in Matthew (Matt. 28:19), Luke (Luke 24:47), and Acts (Acts 1:8).
• The AV (which retains the ‘long ending’ of Mark Ch. 16) calls Mark’s Gospel: The Gospel According to SAINT Mark. The modern ecumenical versions take the word ‘Saint’ out of the Book’s title. So before the Gospel even begins, you have the AKJV exuding a greater degree of holiness. Therefore it is holy in its rendition of Mark’s Gospel from the beginning to the ending.
• The modern revisers are cowards. If Mark 16:9-20 doesn’t belong in the Bible, why do you print it in there? Take it out if that’s what you believe. But they are hypocrites and compromisers: so they put it brackets. They think that makes them look smart; I think it makes them look stupid, faithless, and unbelieving.
• If you think Vaticanus is an authority to stand on; I’d hate to be you when the Lord Jesus judges you at the Judgment Seat of Christ with an English AV 1611.
• To question the legitimacy of Mark 16:9-20 in the Protestant Bibles is akin to the ‘dumb God’ theory Dr. Sam Gipp wrote about in his book ‘Gipp’s Understandable History of the Bible’ (page 55).
• M.E. wants to get rid of Protestantism, and replace it with apostasy and lukewarm ecumenicism. I say we get rid of M.E. and keep our Protestant Holy Bible (AV)!!! I also say we should get rid of M.E.’s stupid ass preaching and bring back the doctrinal preaching of the blood of Christ’s cross!
• M.E. denies the authenticity of the Authorized Version in Mark 16:9-20, but he won’t dare question the AV’s ending of the Lord’s Prayer in Matt. 6:13. Why? Because it is our tradition at MMBC to repeat the ENTIRE Prayer (Matt. 6:9-13) from St. Matthew from the King James Version. Therefore, he is a hypocrite, because the Vaticanus manuscript not only omits Mark 16:9-20, but also the ending of the Lord’s Prayer. That’s why Roman Catholics don’t repeat “For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.”
• Hey M.E., why don’t you mention that the Alexandrian bibles not only omit Mark 16:9-20, but also deny the Holy Incarnation in 1 Timothy 3:16!!!???
• I say like Billy Sunday said, “Where scholarship says one thing and the Bible says another, scholarship can go plumb to the devil.”
• Some critical bibles even question the authenticity of “the Son of God” in the very first verse of St. Mark’s Gospel! That would include the Message and the NWT. Sounds like Genesis 3:1 to me! The RSV and NRSV raise doubt about its authenticity with a footnote.
• The Alexandrian bibles completely remove the Holy Spirit’s quotation of Isaiah 53:12 from St. Mark’s Gospel (15:28). Those are specific and prophetic details of the most important event in the history of the world—the Crucifixion of the Lord Jesus Christ! I’m not kidding the Alexandrians and Laodiceans have removed, not only this verse, but 17 whole Scriptures from the New Testament—including the Trinitarian Passage of 1 John 5:7! Woe unto them! But here’s the funny thing, they don’t re-number the verses, they simply skip it! Does that sound “holy” to you? Sounds like a con man’s job to me. They remove the whole passage from the Holy Bible, but still keep the KJV’s verse numbering system! Hypocrites!
• The Alexandrians also remove 2 ENTIRE VERSES from the Lord Jesus Christ fire and brimstone preaching in Mark 9:44, 46, 48! These are the same perverts who removed the ending to this Gospel of Saint Mark. ¶ They also removed "...This kind can come forth by nothing, but by prayer and fasting." from the same chapter (Mark 9:29).
• Vaticanus cannot be an authentic manuscript because it does not have the seal of Jesus’ testimony (Rev. 22:16) because there is no Book of Revelation in the Vaticanus manuscript.
• I heard M.E. preach his ‘judge not’ sermons over and over again. And at least twice from John 8:1-11. Why does he like the story of the woman caught in adultery? Because Christ (the Judge [see John 5:22]) restrained judgment and shewed her mercy. I like that too (don’t get me wrong) but that is not ‘the whole counsel of God’ (see Acts 20:27). The rest of the counsel of God is that God loves judgment and vengeance! (see Ps. 33:5, 37:28, 99:4; Rom. 12:19; Heb. 10:30, 12:29) But here is where M.E. is a hypocrite: he’ll omit Mark 16:9-20 because it is on the resurrection (which the devil hates also). But even though John 7:53-8:11 ALSO IS IN BRACKETS IN THE NEW VERSIONS he’ll read that one because it makes God look like a liberal pacifist. And after all, an apostate minister’s job is to give you a false Jesus and a false gospel. Therefore, great job M.E.!  Their end will be according to their works! (2 Cor. 11:15)